Daniel Ingham

Year of call: 2020

Daniel Ingham accepts instructions in all areas of chambers practice and is a CPS Grade 3 Prosecutor.

Daniel prosecutes and defends in a range of matters across the Magistrates’ and Crown Court at all stages including first appearances, PTPH, trials and sentencing. Daniel also has experience in making a variety of applications at all stages of proceedings.

Daniel has been instructed in cases including violent, sexual, theft and driving offences. Daniel has experience in cases involving vulnerable defendants, witnesses, and youths as well as expert witnesses.

Daniel is also regularly instructed by police forces in a variety of matters. This includes Sexual Risk Orders, Sexual Harm Prevention Orders, Domestic Violence Protection Orders and Cash Forfeiture Applications. Daniel has been asked to provide advice on merits, deal with interim orders and proceed the cases through to a final hearings. Daniel also has experience dealing with Third Party Disclosure Orders between the police and the Family Court.

Daniel has also been instructed the act on behalf of the Appropriate Authority in Police Misconduct Hearings.

Daniel has been appointed to the List of Specialist Regulatory Advocates at Grade C and prosecutes on behalf of the Attorney-General for the Health and Safety Executive, Environment Agency, Office of Rail and Road, Natural Resources Wales, the Care Quality Commission and the Office for Product Safety and Standards

Daniel is a mentor with the Newcastle University Bar Society and provides training to assist students with advocacy and has judged a variety of mooting and advocacy competitions.

Crime

Recent Cases

Operation Cambridge [2025] – Successful prosecution of eight defendants for operating drugs lines to sell class A drugs throughout Preston.

R v GA [2025] – Led by Ian Mullarkey in the defence of GA, a captain of a boat involved in a conspiracy to import Class A drugs via Southern Ports.

R v MF and SF [2024] – Led by Ian Mullarkey in the prosecution of a Class A drugs conspiracy using an Encrochat phone. The case involved submissions in relation to the admissibility of Encrochat Material.

Operation Boise [2024] – Led by Deborah Smithies in the prosecution of 8 defendants for a conspiracy to supply drugs into HMP Northumberland and the surrounding area.

R v GB [2024] – Successful defence of GB who was accused of taking part in the kidnapping of a male in Bradford who was then later tortured at a house in Sheffield. The case involved submissions of an abuse of process in relation to the complainant hiding behind his right against self incrimination to avoid answering questions he did not want to answer. GB was the only defendant who made a successful half time submission following careful consideration of the ID evidence in the case.

R v RD [2023] – Successful defence of an 18 year old who was accused of section 18 wounding with intent. The defendant was accused of stabbing a man with learning difficulties to the hand and chest. The issue in the case was ID. The defendant required the assistance of an intermediary for the giving of his evidence. The case also involved applications to adduce the defendants bad character.

Police

Practice Summary

Daniel is regularly instructed to advise and represent the police at a range of applications on behalf of the police including DVPO’s, Gang Injunctions, Cash Forfeiture Orders and ASB injunctions. Daniel has also been instructed to review material on behalf of the police for LPP and redact sensitive material

Recent Cases

Disciplinary Proceedings

PC GC [2026] – represented the Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police at disciplinary proceedings involving allegations of sexual harassment, inappropriate jokes in the workplace and inappropriate discussions with youths who were being spoken too by the police.

PC KB [2025] - Represented the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police at disciplinary proceedings involving allegations of Assaults.

DC PB [2025] – Advised the Chief Constable in relation to allegations that an officer had pretended to be working from home.

Operational policing

CCWYP v SH and Ors [2026] – represented West Yorkshire Police in applications for 13 Account Forfeiture Orders totalling £1.9 million. The case involved allegations of fraud by the respondent who claimed to be an expert in banking and financial instruments. The case also involved issues of jurisdiction, as some of those involved in the case were based in the United States, and the use of AI by a litigant in person who was an interested party to proceedings.

CCWYP v IK [2025] – Represented West Yorkshire Police in a response to an application under the Police Property Act for the return of a mobile phone which had been seized due to suspicions that it had been used in breach of terms of a SHPO.

CCNP v JR [2024] – Represented Nottinghamshire Police in an application for a Stalking Protection Order.

CCNP v SD [2024] – Represented Nottinghamshire Police in a contested application for a Sexual Risk Order for an individual who was communicating with underage children in the Philippines.

CCWYP v SM and MM [2024] – Represented West Yorkshire Police in a contested firearms appeal.

CCCP v SP [2023] – Daniel represented a Police Force at a Firearms appeal.

CCLP v AK [2022] – Daniel represented Lincolnshire Police Force at a Cash Forfeiture Application of £3025.00 and an Account Forfeiture Order of £6778.15. Following a contested hearing, the Police Force were successful in their applications.

Sports Law

Practice Summary

Daniel sits as a Disciplinary Panel Member for the Football Association. He is familiar with the FA Handbook and has been involved in disciplinary proceedings involving youths as well as adults.

Daniel is available to represent players or sports associations in disciplinary proceedings.

Public & Regulatory

Practice summary

Recent cases

HSE v Dugdale Nutrition Ltd [2026] – Prosecution of a company following an employee having their finger amputated during the cleaning of a machine.

HSE v Futamura Chemical UK Ltd [2026] – Successful prosecution of a company who failed to ensure the welfare of their employees. The case concerned the buildup of Hydrogen Sulphide gas, and the employees who collapsed in a storeroom. One of the employees sadly passed away after they were taken to hospital.

HSE v SL and BL [2025] – successful prosecution for defective work carried out to a gas boiler where one of the defendants was not registered to undertake such work.