Daniel Ingham

  • Year Of Call

    Year of call: 2020
Daniel Ingham


Year of call: 2020

Call clerks: 0113 297 1200

Email clerks: clerks@kbwchambers.com

  • Practice Summary

    Daniel Ingham accepts instructions in all areas of chambers practice and is a CPS Grade 1 Prosecutor.

    Daniel is a mentor with the Newcastle University Bar Society and provides training to assist students with advocacy and has judged a variety of mooting and advocacy competitions.


    BPTC – BPP Law School (Leeds) 2019-2020
    Law Degree – Newcastle University 2016-2019

    Prizes Scholarships

    Recipient of the South Square Scholarships from Middle Temple in 2019
    Finalist of the Inner Temple Inter-Varsity Moot in 2019
    Winner of the Newcastle University Junior Individual Moot in 2017

  • Crime

    Daniel prosecutes and defends in a range of matters across the Magistrates’ and Crown Court at all stages including first appearances, PTPH, trials and sentencing. Daniel also has experience in making a variety of applications at all stages of proceedings.

    Daniel has been instructed in cases including violent, sexual, theft and driving offences. Daniel has experience in cases involving vulnerable defendants, witnesses, and youths as well as expert witnesses.

    Recent Cases

    R v RB & EW [2022] – Successful prosecution of two defendants accused of ABH who attended at the address of the complainant and scared him into jumping out of a window. During the trial, a successful application was made to adduce bad character evidence because of evidence given by the defendant.

    R v KA [2021] – Successful defence of a defendant accused of assaulting his partner with a fork causing bloody scratches. As a result of the cross examination of the two prosecution witnesses by Daniel, which exposed inconsistent timings of events, differing accounts of the injuries suffered as well as the complainant misleading the magistrates that they had a history of self-harm which could account for the injury, the magistrates dismissed the case at the close of the prosecution case.

    R v MA [2021] – Successful defence of a 20-year-old who was accused of assaulting someone in the street alongside his father. The incident was captured on CCTV. Daniel successfully argued self-defence and the defendant was acquitted.

    R v NF [2021] – Successful defence of a women with mental difficulties who needed the assistance of an intermediary. The defendant was accused of criminal damage by scraping a key down the side of a car, supposedly captured on CCTV. Following cross examination, the witness admitted that he had not considered the whole of the footage and whether the damage could have been caused at any other time. The defendant was acquitted.

    R v AH [2021] – Successful prosecution for sexual assault of a comedy performer who groped a female at his comedy show.

  • Family

    Daniel has experience of acting in both public and private family cases, having acted for mothers, fathers, guardians, and local authorities.

    Daniel has acted in cases involving serious allegations including rape, sexual activity with a child family member and non-accidental injury.

  • Police

    Daniel is regularly instructed to advise and represent the police at a range of applications on behalf of the police including DVPO’s, Gang Injunctions, Cash Forfeiture Orders and ASB injunctions. Daniel has also been instructed to review material on behalf of the police for LPP and redact sensitive material.

    Daniel is keen to grow this area of practice.

  • Personal Injury

    During pupillage Daniel drafted papers in relation to NIHL and has acted in Infant Approval Hearings.

    Daniel is keen to grow this area of practice.

  • Business and Property

    Daniel has been instructed in a boundary dispute involving a dispute over the location of a garden fence and alleging trespass.

    Daniel has also acted in a debt recovery case where the claimant had been duped into lending over £20,000 to her employer which they had never paid back. The claimant received judgment for the whole of the money owed and costs on the indemnity basis.