
Called to the Bar: 1993, Inner Temple
He has an extensive advisory practice and regularly appears in High Court, County court and various statutory tribunals dealing with high value cases in the following areas of practice:
All types of property related work including easements, rights of light, restrictive covenants, boundaries, adverse possession, trusts of land, constructive/resulting trusts, proprietary estoppel with a particular emphasis on property development projects as well as nuisance and trespass.
He also deals with disputes arising from the purchase and sale of land including options as well as contracts to build and sale of property.
All aspect of Landlord and Tenant, particularly business tenancies including disputes arising on renewal, assignment and termination including repairing covenants and dilapidation claims.
All aspect of employment law including wrongful and unfair dismissal, redundancy, DDA, discrimination in all forms including discrimination on the grounds of sex, race, sexual orientation and age, TUPE, Human Rights, restrictive covenants, trade secrets.
Company law and shareholder disputes, commercial contracts, commercial agency, partnership, guarantees, agency, economic torts, commercial fraud, sale of goods and supply of services, professional negligence including accountancy, solicitors, surveyors, architects, building contracts, IT professionals and financial lending institutions;
Trusts and breach of trust including fraud and undue influence, securities and disputes involving financial lending institutions, wills, probate and Inheritance Act Claims.
He has extensive experience of the VAT and Duties Tribunal.
Much of his work is advisory and cannot be disclosed in the interests of his clients.
Laycock v Pluck
King v Doughty
Rights of way
Armitage Sykes
Cobble Fold Developments v Tinker
Breach of contract and trust concerning the transfer of Land, property development
Levi Solicitors
Cooplands v Greggs plc
Restrictive Covenant enforcement between businesses, loss of business damages claim; settlement confidential.
Atherton Godfrey
Smith v Evans
Right of way to commercial premises
Tierney & Co
McIlroy v Southwell and Nottingham Diocesan Board of Finance
Reference to HM Adjudicator
Adverse Possession
Atherton Godfrey
Redfearn v Owen
Reference to HM Adjudicator
Rights of way
Armitage Sykes
Haigh v McKay
Property related dispute
Atherton Godfrey
Rockley Old Hall v Glasby
Action for obstruction of easement, concerning development of Manor House
Irwin Mitchell
Dhillon v Dyson
Conveyancing transaction dispute
Armitage Sykes
Timson Retail v. Cattee
Business Tenancy dispute
Armitage Sykes
Crossland v Haslam Homes Ltd
Employment, disability discrimination
Atherton Godfrey
Evans v Haslam Homes Ltd
Successful dismissal of a sexual orientation claim on procedural grounds before the Employment Appeal Tribunal
Employment, sexual orientation discrimination
Atherton Godfrey
Sutcliffe v Coca-Cola Ltd
Employment claim concerning the age of retirement, settled in favour of Claimant.
Rice-Jones Solicitors
Hussain v Alam and Bi
Undue influence, solicitors negligence, proprietary estoppel, constructive trusts
Schofield Sweeney
Hartley v Allen
Gift procured by undue influence
Atherton Godfrey
Badger v Clymo
Constructive Trusts
Schofield Sweeney
Carlac v Frost
Guarantees and TOLATA.
Atherton Godfrey
Re Baxter Deceased
Wills/Distribution of estates
Armitage Sykes
Bell v Rogers
Inheritance Act Claim
Atherton Godfrey
Parnall v Parnall
Inheritance Act Claim
Tierney & Co
Lawton v Holmes
Inheritance Act claim
Bailey Smailes
Wood v Berg & Company
Breach of Trust claim involving solicitors
Atherton Godfrey
Dunham Holdings Ltd v Vickers Orriss
Surveyor’s Negligence
Armitage Sykes
Green v Sentley Wilson Bowen
Solicitors negligence
Atherton Godfrey
Thurloe v Richmond and Overton
Breach of Contract, instructed on appeal to High court
Irwin Mitchell
He has appeared in over 135 cases on behalf of HMRC throughout the country including recently
Nottinghamshire Wildlife Trust v. HMRC
Abel v. HMRC
He is authorised by the Bar Council to accept instructions in accordance with the Public Access Rules which enable members of the public, in many circumstances, to instruct a barrister direct.